The Piercing Truth

This is right from the dictionary and seems to describe Albuquerque, Berry and Schultz. Fascism (f ash ,izem) noun An authoritarian right wing system of government and/or social organization. (in general use) extreme right wing, authoritarian, chauvinistic and/or intolerant views or practices. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one group over another, national, ethnic, especially social strata or monetarily; a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach. Compliments of one of our Eyes

Dec 30, 2010

Who is the “God Father”? Does he have KRQE and KOAT Sleeping with the Fish?

The Eye is wondering if we have our own “Don Corleone” in City Hall. This is the story KRQE News 13 said didn't exist. Surprise! We have it! Unfortunately for them (and Darren White and his Taco Bell visiting right hand man, T.J. Wilham), The Eye found what this group of "dedicated news professionals" wanted to sweep under the carpet. The Eye has the story KRQE posted on their website before someone at the station decided the public it serves deserves to know about and pulled it. KOAT News 7 also posted a similar story before removing it. What is known is, KRQE reporter Katie Kim posted this story on-line at 4:09 pm. Then it was taken down shortly after going up and its very existence denied by station. Why? Why post a news story regarding an FBI investigate that involves the city's Chief Public Safety Officer and his wife; then pull it down in a matter of hours? Why deny its existence? If there was a legitimate reason for taking it off their website why not say so? Why engage in behavior that makes it look like a cover-up?

Here are other questions worth asking KRQE News 13 and KOAT News 7:

Did the fact that Darren White worked as a reporter at KRQE and still has friends there influence the station's decision to hide their own news story?

Would KRQE editor Paul Burt's repeated statements that he "would walk through fire for Darren White" indicate bias or lack of objectivity when it came to covering White or his current wife negatively?

Would the fact that mayoral spokesperson Chris Ramirez worked at KOAT News 7 as the City Hall reporter and also maintains relationships with his former employer have played a role in KOAT's decision to pull their own story?

Could former police beat reporter T.J. Wilham's friendships and personal contacts at the Albuquerque Journal be part of the reason the newspaper hasn't written a single word about the Ahrensfield defense motion or about Wilham's brand new city vehicle?

How incestuous is Albuquerque? (and we haven't begun to mention former KRQE anchor Erika Ruiz's role in all this)

Did Darren White, Chris Ramirez, T.J. Wilham or any other member of the Berry Administration contact personnel at either of these stations and demand that the news stories be pulled?

Is it news that when he was first asked who tipped him off that he was being investigated for selling drugs and other criminal activity that Shawn Bryan said it was Kathy McConnell, aka Darren White's then girlfriend/current wife?

Is it news that the FBI interviewed the current Mrs. White because she may have been texting information about the criminal investigation to Erika Ruiz, aka Mrs. Shawn Bryan?

If information was being exchanged between Mrs. White and Mrs. Bryan, where did that information come from?

How close was Darren White truly with Shawn Bryan before testifying that he barely knew him?

You can contact your KRQE News 13 here:

http://www.krqe.com/subindex/participate/report_it

KOAT News 7 here:

http://www.koat.com/contact/index.html

Finally, who is the “Don Corleone” who is responsible for shutting down this news story? Were they made an offer that they couldn’t refuse? Or is it just some “Dirty Bird”? It might be a good idea for our local media to step out of the cooler and leave the fish alone; if this is what has transpired. Otherwise; something simply smells fishy.

Here is the story as it appears on the KRQE website:

Convicted ex-cop files motion to dismiss
Ahrensfield defense says key evidence left out

Updated: Monday, 20 Dec 2010, 4:09 PM MST
Published : Monday, 20 Dec 2010, 4:09 PM MST

• Reporter: Katie Kim
ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) - A jury found former Albuquerque Police officer Brad Ahrensfield guilty of obstructing justice last week for tipping off a friend who was the target of a criminal investigation. But on Monday, his defense filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the government violated rules by not disclosing key evidence.

According to the defense, the evidence in question is at least one government-conducted interview with the business owner at the center of the investigation. The interview was taped in April after the first trial ended with a deadlocked jury.

Ahrensfield was still an APD officer when he told a friend last year that investigators suspected drugs and stolen goods were being peddled out of his business.

Ahrensfield always insisted he didn't tell his friend he was the one being investigated. The defense claims when the FBI interviewed the friend, he said it was then-Sheriff Darren White's girlfriend who tipped him off that he was the subject of the investigation.

According to the defense, it didn't know this interview was conducted until last week.
A federal judge said he needs transcripts of that recorded interview and the entire trial to make a decision. Ahrensfield's attorney told News 13 it will likely take one to two months before the judge decides on the motion to dismiss.

If the judge upholds the guilty conviction, Ahrensfield faces up to 20 years in prison.

Source:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZGsX3YMlGpEJ:www.krqe.com/dpp/news/local/central/convicted-ex-cop-files-motion-to-dismiss+http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/local/central/convicted-ex-cop-files-motion-to-dismiss&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

54 comments:

Anonymous said...

So the citizens of Albuquerque just sit in the dark?
The media just report the same old safe, mundane shit, night after night and ignore this.
I guess the 'Eye' is calling out the media now.
What say you media? Cat got your tongue? You are surely pathetic cowards.

Anonymous said...

Mayor Berry and his transparency bullshit in action. Wake up mayor, this story and your guys involved are making you look like a fool.
I know, it's always the wife that's the last to know and they laugh out loud behind your back.
This keeps up, you'll be standing in line for more than just a meatball.

Anonymous said...

Brad Ahrensfield here; Those are great questions, some I really want to know myself. But, this story goes deeper than just Darren White, the fabric of this story weaves itself all the way to Chief Ray Shultz's office, threads itself into Deputy Chief Mike Callaway's office all the way too City Attorney Cathy Levy's office, makes a knot in Internal Affairs acting (at the time) Lt's office all the way down then anchors itself in SID.
If you doubt me, pay attention folks, I have pages of proof, that was delivered to me by an unknown (seriously) delivery person after the trial in April, apparently by someone who doesnt like the way business was being conducted in the US attorney's office. These pages are the very reason you can find on record a Tort claim filed by my Attorney against the City of Albuquerque alleging Negligance and Retaliation! Also, ask yourself why I have two witnesses that in the first week in October 2009, DC Mike Callaway was saying in open meetings that "Ron Olivas was going to be fine but Brad is going to prison" when in the first week of October the AUSA assigned to this case was Yarborough and he was on paternity leave and had not even looked at this case for yet another month! How does that happen? A Deputy Chief who can predict the future! The same DC who wrote a three page summation on a Police Officer named Orlando Comancho whom he wanted prosecuted for First Degree Murder, in the accidental shooting death of his Stepfather. He made an opinion on this case even though he did absolutely no investigation himself and it was contrary to the opinions of Detectives, Criminalist, and Experts in the case. Through fate I was the only witness to testify on behalf of Comacho, and through my testimony alone he was acquitted of Murder. I immediately felt the wrath of the Fifth Floor and my transfer From SWAT to the Police Academy was suspended, pending review of my Expert testimony (ask an officer how many times they heard of that happening). Come to find out-from the FBI no less- it was done by Chief Ray Shultz and I quote, "to make me uncomfortable after my testimony in the Comacho trial" Statement by yet to be named interviewee in the Chiefs office! This coming from a Chief who has a history of retaliation! Look it up April 2009 almost a million dollars paid out more case pendind and a sealed settlement by none other than Sheriff Darren White. I cant make this stuff up. Retaliation is the way business is conducted on APD. I have more, I only have just started!

Anonymous said...

well krqe looks like the EYE has you dead to rights and i feel it wont be long until they have koat.you people have the nerve to call yourselves news, WOW ! lets face it you are controlled by the powerful,and you will fall with them.This will not go away ! Brad yes we all are very aware of darren and ray and how they paint a big fat target on the back of any one who testifies honestly or who speakes up and states the truth against their spin. mean while darren protects leo's bar after his big hard hitting news release against the bar. yes darren we know and we have proof. the police shooting at 7/11 also needs to be looked at. no one can say anything or you will be targeted and fired for some trumped up charge. if you cross ray your career is over. BRAD YOU NEED TO WATCH YOUR BACK. THEY HAVE TO SHUT YOU UP. DONT PUT IT PAST THEM TO SHUT YOU UP AND BE RULED SUICIDE. WHO WOULD INVESTIGATE A.P.D. / F.B.I. ? it would let them all off the hook. the media would report that crazy Brad was found dead an appparant suicide. e- mail everything you have to the EYE ,or give it to someone you trust with your life.

Anonymous said...

Folks, the fix is in. If Brad did tip the drug dealer off, where'd he get his information? He wasn't part of the investigation. If he knew anything he got it from someone else. Another question. Why'd they give Shawn Bryan immunity? The drug dealer goes free no matter what. Was it to shut him up while Brad Ahrensfield a working stiff cop takes the rap? Why would they give the target of the criminal investigation full blown immunity?

Anonymous said...

Seeing Ray in the media a lot but no Darren. Hmmmm

Anonymous said...

the link doesn't work. i had to copy and paste. no doubt 13 took this down to protect white. scumbags

Anonymous said...

Yeah Albuquerque it was OK for the press to report anything and everything when Officer Ahrensfield was thrown under the bus. It was Ok to have press there at the first trial in April when attorney Tara Neda violated Garrity and brought up Officer Ahrensfield past IA investigations that he was exonerated for. Those reports hit the internet in minutes.She didn't want the press there the day the motion was filed for dismissal because her record for unethical behavior was being brought to light. Oh yeah now the tide has turned. Be responsible journalists and report both sides, be fair to all those in Albuquerque.

Anonymous said...

Brad, I sure hope you sue everyone involved. Schultz already cost the taxpayers $1,000,000 for the Costales incident. He is a civil rights abuser. Why did Berry keep him as chief? There is something more going on and the only way to figure it out is to sue them.

I also think it is weird that a retired rehire, who is a big buddy of Schultz, gets arrested for felony domestic violence in California. This victim (his girlfriend) of course doesnt' show up so the case is tossed. Schultz could have fired him based upon him being bound over for trial, but nooooooooooo. This guy is still sleeping it off at the muesum at the main station. Just how many of us have gotten a tour of this museum? Why do we need a full time officer there, if the muesum never opens? Why didn't Ray fire this guy based upon the criminal complaint? And this is just one example of Schultz's poor leadership.

Anonymous said...

This so stinks. They won't report on this and they won't report on the Restraining Order wife #2 has on Darren. It's under seal. Same thing they wanted to do with Brad's motion to dismiss. The ABQ media may be a bigger bunch of whotes than the ones at TD's. At least the girls are honest about what they're getting paid for.

Anonymous said...

WHEN, will someone from outside look into all of this?
Local media is out. We need a national news agency to look at this. Will the Dept of Justice or the US attorney General look at this, since the local FBI is looking the other way .

Anonymous said...

Anyone know if Vegas has odds on any of this stuff? I'd like to 'invest' a few bucks in the outcome.

Throw in the weirdness surrounding Mary Han's death, and the continuing saga of Levi Chavez, and it may not be a question of IF Schultz and White get axed or indicted, but when and for what.

Too bad we don't have our own version of WikiLeaks' document dump. The ledgers at city hall must be full of records documenting payments to victims of official misdeeds, and to lawyers defending the city for incompetence and worse.

Anonymous said...

this is where/how to file an FCC complaint against a news broadcasting entity you believe to be unethically broadcasting material or intentionally shedding people/businesses in a false light. Please, have it.

http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm?sid=d1e650&id=d1e707

Anonymous said...

Ethics
Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct

TAKEN FROM RTNDA'S WEBSITE

PREAMBLE

Professional electronic journalists should operate as trustees of the public, seek the truth, report it fairly and with integrity and independence, and stand accountable for their actions.

PUBLIC TRUST: Professional electronic journalists should recognize that their first obligation is to the public.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Understand that any commitment other than service to the public undermines trust and credibility.
* Recognize that service in the public interest creates an obligation to reflect the diversity of the community and guard against oversimplification of issues or events.
* Provide a full range of information to enable the public to make enlightened decisions.
* Fight to ensure that the public's business is conducted in public.

TRUTH: Professional electronic journalists should pursue truth aggressively and present the news accurately, in context, and as completely as possible.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Continuously seek the truth.
* Resist distortions that obscure the importance of events.
* Clearly disclose the origin of information and label all material provided by outsiders.

Professional electronic journalists should not:

* Report anything known to be false.
* Manipulate images or sounds in any way that is misleading.
* Plagiarize.
* Present images or sounds that are reenacted without informing the public.

FAIRNESS: Professional electronic journalists should present the news fairly and impartially, placing primary value on significance and relevance.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Treat all subjects of news coverage with respect and dignity, showing particular compassion to victims of crime or tragedy.
* Exercise special care when children are involved in a story and give children greater privacy protection than adults.
* Seek to understand the diversity of their community and inform the public without bias or stereotype.
* Present a diversity of expressions, opinions, and ideas in context.
* Present analytical reporting based on professional perspective, not personal bias.
* Respect the right to a fair trial.

Anonymous said...

INTEGRITY: Professional electronic journalists should present the news with integrity and decency, avoiding real or perceived conflicts of interest, and respect the dignity and intelligence of the audience as well as the subjects of news.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Identify sources whenever possible. Confidential sources should be used only when it is clearly in the public interest to gather or convey important information or when a person providing information might be harmed. Journalists should keep all commitments to protect a confidential source.
* Clearly label opinion and commentary.
* Guard against extended coverage of events or individuals that fails to significantly advance a story, place the event in context, or add to the public knowledge.
* Refrain from contacting participants in violent situations while the situation is in progress.
* Use technological tools with skill and thoughtfulness, avoiding techniques that skew facts, distort reality, or sensationalize events.
* Use surreptitious newsgathering techniques, including hidden cameras or microphones, only if there is no other way to obtain stories of significant public importance and only if the technique is explained to the audience.
* Disseminate the private transmissions of other news organizations only with permission.

Professional electronic journalists should not:

* Pay news sources who have a vested interest in a story.
* Accept gifts, favors, or compensation from those who might seek to influence coverage.
* Engage in activities that may compromise their integrity or independence.

INDEPENDENCE: Professional electronic journalists should defend the independence of all journalists from those seeking influence or control over news content.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Gather and report news without fear or favor, and vigorously resist undue influence from any outside forces, including advertisers, sources, story subjects, powerful individuals, and special interest groups.
* Resist those who would seek to buy or politically influence news content or who would seek to intimidate those who gather and disseminate the news.
* Determine news content solely through editorial judgment and not as the result of outside influence.
* Resist any self-interest or peer pressure that might erode journalistic duty and service to the public.
* Recognize that sponsorship of the news will not be used in any way to determine, restrict, or manipulate content.
* Refuse to allow the interests of ownership or management to influence news judgment and content inappropriately.
* Defend the rights of the free press for all journalists, recognizing that any professional or government licensing of journalists is a violation of that freedom.

ACCOUNTABILITY: Professional electronic journalists should recognize that they are accountable for their actions to the public, the profession, and themselves.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Actively encourage adherence to these standards by all journalists and their employers.
* Respond to public concerns. Investigate complaints and correct errors promptly and with as much prominence as the original report.
* Explain journalistic processes to the public, especially when practices spark questions or controversy.
* Recognize that professional electronic journalists are duty-bound to conduct themselves ethically.
* Refrain from ordering or encouraging courses of action that would force employees to commit an unethical act.
* Carefully listen to employees who raise ethical objections and create environments in which such objections and discussions are encouraged.
* Seek support for and provide opportunities to train employees in ethical decision-making.

In meeting its responsibility to the profession of electronic journalism, RTDNA has created this code to identify important issues, to serve as a guide for its members, to facilitate self-scrutiny, and to shape future debate.

Anonymous said...

INTEGRITY: Professional electronic journalists should present the news with integrity and decency, avoiding real or perceived conflicts of interest, and respect the dignity and intelligence of the audience as well as the subjects of news.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Identify sources whenever possible. Confidential sources should be used only when it is clearly in the public interest to gather or convey important information or when a person providing information might be harmed. Journalists should keep all commitments to protect a confidential source.
* Clearly label opinion and commentary.
* Guard against extended coverage of events or individuals that fails to significantly advance a story, place the event in context, or add to the public knowledge.
* Refrain from contacting participants in violent situations while the situation is in progress.
* Use technological tools with skill and thoughtfulness, avoiding techniques that skew facts, distort reality, or sensationalize events.
* Use surreptitious newsgathering techniques, including hidden cameras or microphones, only if there is no other way to obtain stories of significant public importance and only if the technique is explained to the audience.
* Disseminate the private transmissions of other news organizations only with permission.

Professional electronic journalists should not:

* Pay news sources who have a vested interest in a story.
* Accept gifts, favors, or compensation from those who might seek to influence coverage.
* Engage in activities that may compromise their integrity or independence.

INDEPENDENCE: Professional electronic journalists should defend the independence of all journalists from those seeking influence or control over news content.

Professional electronic journalists should:

* Gather and report news without fear or favor, and vigorously resist undue influence from any outside forces, including advertisers, sources, story subjects, powerful individuals, and special interest groups.
* Resist those who would seek to buy or politically influence news content or who would seek to intimidate those who gather and disseminate the news.
* Determine news content solely through editorial judgment and not as the result of outside influence.
* Resist any self-interest or peer pressure that might erode journalistic duty and service to the public.
* Recognize that sponsorship of the news will not be used in any way to determine, restrict, or manipulate content.
* Refuse to allow the interests of ownership or management to influence news judgment and content inappropriately.
* Defend the rights of the free press for all journalists, recognizing that any professional or government licensing of journalists is a violation of that freedom.

Anonymous said...

and there is so much more on ethics please continue reading on ethics broadcasting 101. EVERYONE in broadcasting who has cut their teeth knows these are the ethics rules..if they're not being followed it's because there are deeper agendas.

http://www.rtdna.org/pages/media_items/code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct48.php?g=36?id=48

Anonymous said...

Bla , bla, bla above.
This is just bad tuna and I don't mean the kind at TDs.

Anonymous said...

Saw TJ at Golden Pride drive thru this AM, getting two bags of groceries.

Anonymous said...

Why retaliate against brad for his testimony in camachos trial. Why would calloway say one thing different than the evidence. That doesn't sound right

Anonymous said...

Brad Ahrensfield here; Callaway was dead set and took it personal on prosecuting Comacho for first degree murder, and pushed that case through the DA's office. I was contacted by the DA's prior to the Grand Jury as an expert on Defensive Tactics and in particular Gun Retention. After several meetings and getting my opinion of the case I could tell the Asst DA's were uncomfortable with what the evidence on my end was showing. But Callaway wanted him prosecuted and the case pressed on. But, after a Grand Jury, I testified for the defense in the trial on short notice because they (the prosecution) accidently left me on the witness list and retained a FBI agent from the FBI Academy who couldnt even get qualified as an expert on the stand! I was the only witness for the defense and after i testified the Jury saw the truth and Comacho was acquitted. Long story short Callaway was furious and the next day my transfer from SWAT to the APD Academy was put on hold pending the review of my testimony (which by the way I have never seen done in Fifteen years if its ever been done). But Shultz rules the Department by fear and intimidation, common knowledge. He has a documented history of it! But as most officers who have been on any time know that my history with being ambushed by Callaway goes back more than a decade. Thats another story. Plus Callaway has always been known as a headhunter that's his reputation on the department, and its normally not a big deal unless its your head he's hunting!

Anonymous said...

Brad either you tipped Bryan off or you didn't. Stop babbling about Camacho. Did you tip off Shawn? If not, who did? Did Darren know about the investigation? Did Kathy? Did the Whites hang out with Shawn and Erika? Did they tailgate, drink or go to Vegas together? That's all anyone cares about. Tell the truth and we will back you. You're either a patsy or a crook. Which is it? 2011 doesn't have to be like 2010 if you're really an honest man.

Anonymous said...

As an ordinary citizen reading everything and watching, I have to say, "I am truely sorry to live in the world in which we live in today." I am worried for my children and their children and their future(s). There are very few honest people that we can trust to protect us and our rights. We are fighting a losing battle with DRUGS!!! It seems to me that there are too many money hungry people and drugs are the fastest and easiest means of income for our future politicians. The drug cartels have these dirty cops and politicians in their pockets, 'In hopes of grand gestures.' What also scares me is what we are teaching our children; in order to get anything in this world you have to steal, cheat and lie to get what you want and it doesn't matter who you step on to get there. The people who try living a decent honest life are thrown under the bus. It's a wonder why God hasn't laid down his hand. If I were you Mr. Berry, Mr. White and whoever this Peaches is I would take a good hard look at where I want to go after this life; heaven or hell?

Anonymous said...

What do you mean stop babbling about camacho. I hope to God you are not accused of something you didn't do and you need someone to help you out.

Anonymous said...

When is a vote of no confidence going to happen

Anonymous said...

*"When is a vote of no confidence going to happen"*

HAHAHAHAHA!! Yeah, right, like that is EVER going to happen.

Look here, folks. Let me explain how things work in this town:

Your cheif and just about everybody directly under him are corrupt. The local media is under lockdown, and in the complete control of Darren White and TJ Wilhem. Joey Sigala may be your union president, but in title only. Yep, you guessed it...he's under the thumb of the 5th floor, too. Oh, and the FBI? Yeah, that's all been taken care of as well.

Bill O'Reilly isn't going to investigate. CNN isn't coming to town to do an expose. Nobody is going to anything. Period.

So give it up people. Nobody's going to do anything. The people that CAN do something are nothing but a bunch of pussies, and are looking out for themselves. Wake up. This is the way it's going to be. So either get on the bus with the rest of these assholes, or shut the hell up. Nothing is ever going to change, and the sooner you get used to that idea, the better off we'll all be.

Anonymous said...

Here is a plan that someone suggested. Every officer bring your car to the next city council meeting. Empty your car and bring your key to be placed in the box provided. Officers will then present the box to City Council and Darren White. The cars will be legally parked around the Main and in the underground parking. It is time to speak up.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, right, never gonna happen. None of you have the balls.

Anonymous said...

The MEMBERS of the APOA are spineless. They will never do anything but complain and whine about how they feel so entitled and how they are so mistreated. These "heros" are ZEROS.

Anonymous said...

Are we going to have a vote of "no confidence" in the members of the APOA? We really should. I am confident that the members of the APOA will continue to act in ways unbecoming of police officers.

Anonymous said...

i blame mark garcia for everything!

Anonymous said...

most of the APOA is spineless, I know of only a couple that are worth a damn, only a couple I want to rep me

Anonymous said...

The ordinary citizen that posted, you should be very aware of how the police department is in the toilet. If you thought Richardson was bad apd is worse it just doesn't get media attention. If you're not one of his boys you need to hope that our next Mayor is gonna clean house. This is with the exception of Paiz.

Anonymous said...

Most are spineless? You only want a couple to rep you?

How about this. Every officer is part of the APOA. When it comes to APOA duties, the officers (ALL) are spineless. They bitch and moan about the APOA Reps and President, when they, the officers do nothing. They sit around with a sense of entitlement and demand others to take the heat for them.

Here is a thought. How about you APOA members getting off your butts and supporting the folks you elected (APOA president etc)? I don't think you have the courage.

Anonymous said...

Are you back JOEY?

Anonymous said...

when the text come out and they will, the Bryans never were dealing anything it was a setup ploy by 2 apd officers who were screwing white politically by setting up there store. The text were in the days and weeks after the initial allegations that an employee gave a guy a 1/4 bag of weed in his offtime yes a 1/4 bag and that was catapulted into a FBI sting...???...read the transcripts its all there. The Bryans did meet with the FBI since this all started with there house in a private neighborhood in broad daylight being robbed while under sid's survelance...yes that is in the text also naming the sid agents involved, is that a coincidence since this went federal and one of the SID agents is on the FBI task force? Brad was a victim of politics and since the whole scam investigation was blown by there own incompetence they rolled him up instead of just coming clean. KRQE is facing litigation from the Bryans for the stories they ran on them and have been trying to cover this mess up since april. Even this story gets close but is still so far from the truth EYE look into the original investigation and you will find the missing links, look at the original statements made, the dates of survellance and you will start seeing what happend YOU ARE SO CLOSE! There is a reason the FBI would not get the text from Bryans wife....

Anonymous said...

Ref the post at 4:44. Interesting but the actions of White and Ahrensfield speak differently...especially White.

Anonymous said...

There is so much for eye to look into. Where do you start

Anonymous said...

Brad isn't the first victim of politics and won't be the last. Next could be you. Your career and life drug through the dirt. It's time to stop it, but how? Suggestions

Anonymous said...

Well well well. Berry and Susan together at her news conference. Interesting

Anonymous said...

If the post ar 4 44 has a time line why don't they provide it. We all know SID Detectives lack knowledge under the pie face Hudsonm

Anonymous said...

Where's Darren in the Susana, Berry news conference. Not enough space in the paper for his jack-o-lantern head or is Berry keeping him and TJ on KP duty (making food runs to Golden Pride)

Anonymous said...

Brad Ahrensfield here; I've been watching the posts and there is some interesting questions that are out there. I have testified twice and told the whole story at the US attorneys office. My story has never changed, not one bit! I feel that if you the reader want to know I will tell you what happened. But, before I do I will pose some questions to you first.

If Shawn Bryan was really up to any criminal activity why was he not prosecuted?? Why couldn't they run a parallel investigation on Bryan at the same time they were gutting me? They claim that I tipped him off to the FBI doing an investigation of his Bank accounts, drugs, and stolen property! Hmmmm, now lets break this down. If Bryan was guilty why did the investigation stop? I mean, if he was money laudering or doing something like that, there certainly would be Bank records, computer records. Hows Bryan gonna go in and change that? If he had stolen property and he was under surveillance by the elite members of the FBI how do you dispose of that??? The same with the drugs,where's the video???? I havent seen it! Also most of you dont know the arrest of the mechanic still went off and he was interrogated by the FBI for almost four hours and theartened by the FBI to give up Bryan or not be able to see his family!!! He told them Bryan had no idea what was going on and he still went to jail! But, strangely there is no tape of that interview even though Sgt Buckner wanted to tape it (according to his testimony)! Why no tape??? Because acording to the mechanic besides the threats and coercion they told him "LOOK AT YOU AND LOOK AT ME, I WILL PUT ON A SUIT AND TIE AND WHO DO THINK THE JURY WILL BELIEVE"! I dont know about you, but I wouldn't want that on tape either! Then to top it off SA Drew Mccandles shows up with other members of the FBI, and a drug dog at Bryans place of buisness with a fake search warrant that he tries to pass off as legit, until Bryan's attorney shows up reads it and tells Mccandles to leave the property! But Bryan still lets them search his entire property even though he knew the warrant was fake! Now I know some of you are going to say, Well he had immunity! Immunity from what? They didnt have anything, they even testified that the investigation stopped! BULL, they didnt have ANYTHING! Al Capone went to prison for Tax Evasion, if they had something dont you think it would have come out??? The whole immunity thing was the advisement of his attorney at the time, because Bryan didnt want to testify, and the MEDIA made him out to be a crook cause it sounded spicey! Then, in this last trial, against the advisement of his current attorney, he refused immunity much to AUSA Tera Nedas dismay because he couldnt be made to look like a Crook cooperating with the Feds to save his own BUTT! I gonna let you ponder these questions, there will be more coming!

Anonymous said...

GOOD FOR YOU BRAD I HOPE EVERYTHING WORKS OUT FOR YOU. SO DID THE MECHANIC GET PROSECUTED OR WHAT HAPPEND TO HIM. ALSO YOUR RIGHT YOU CANT FIX HIS PREVIOUS BANK RECORDS AND CELL PHONE RECORDS. I ASSURE YOU SID COMMAND STAFF WAS GETTING EXTRAS FROM BRYANT FOR BUYING ALL THOSE NEW CARS FROM HIM. WONDER WHAT KIND OF NEW CARS HUDSON AND SMITH PURCHASED AT A GOOD PRICE.

Anonymous said...

AS FOR THE ABOVE POSTER....WE BOUGHT SID ABOUT 6 CARS AND IT PAID 300$ A CAR THE MAIN SUPPLY WAS THE SERVICE SIDE. AS FOR THE SID UPPER COMMAND WHO DO YOU THINK SET THIS SHIT UP???? HUDSON AND SMITH ONCE AGAIN BUT JUST KEEP RAMBLING STUPID COMMENTS. IF YOU LISTENED TO BRAD AND READ THE TRANSCRIPTS YOU WOULD BE KNOWLEGABLE OF THESE FACTS INSTEAD OF PLAYING THE PLAYGROUND RUMOR.

New Mexicos truth teller said...

Keep up the good work, I also like how they didnt tell the residents of albuquerque how it will cost alot of money to transfer over to a pool car system, or even how they refer to dallas PD, Denver PD, and several other when justifying the change. what they didnt tell everyone is that those departments also pay their officers way more money then our local police officers, and that We keep losing officers to those departments. lets keep training them, then run them off, so that we save those departments the money of training them. sorry if I went off topic just not happy with this situation.

Anonymous said...

Good point above. Other departments DO in fact pay more. I would invite this administration to show the public (via the Journal with approval of PIO Commander Wilhelm,) the details of the savings.
The most important thing here is that the public will tire of the lies from Mr. Public Safety, real soon.

Anonymous said...

Give the local media a break, after all they know where to go and find snow in order to make a story happen. Whenever anyone in the country is in the national spot light, the local media always makes sure we know the New Mexico connection. Like that person once ate a burrito in New Mexico. Who cares channel 4, 7, 13

Anonymous said...

The above posts said. SID paid 300 a car wow that's a pretty good price for brand new cars. The rest if the post I didn't understand ie the service side, hudson and smith setting things up. Please explain.

Anonymous said...

buy fee was 300 a car to go to the auction and purchase and float and do the title work. The service side was to do the maitenance on the fleet of sid cars from brakes to oilchanges, the smith and hudson comment was for the commenter who said they must have benefitted...read the trial

Anonymous said...

Hudson..Smith..and Young all got kickbacks from shawn bryant for the no bid contract he got to do service on sid vehicles...then they burned him..do the digging and you will see its all there....guess who hired the car shop? you folksneed to wake up and smell what these guys have shoveled

Anonymous said...

above poster your an idiot first of all there is no T on my name second of all KICKBACKS your talking out your ass cause you have no idea whats going on here other than to post comments that have no VALIDITY at all you know so much about these things bring yourself to the store i have an open door policy but that doesnt work as well as posting anonymous does it....pussy, kickbacks for oilchanges....HA what an idiot

Anonymous said...

It doesn't matter how you spell your name. No one will take the time to talk to you, I believe in police work we call it reliability. Funny earlier you put your name on your post and not on this one. Don't forget everyone Young still has several civil lawsuits pending are you safe?

Anonymous said...

Bryan, why didnt you answer to the allegations of the earlier posts about you?