The Piercing Truth

This is right from the dictionary and seems to describe Albuquerque, Berry and Schultz. Fascism (f ash ,izem) noun An authoritarian right wing system of government and/or social organization. (in general use) extreme right wing, authoritarian, chauvinistic and/or intolerant views or practices. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one group over another, national, ethnic, especially social strata or monetarily; a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach. Compliments of one of our Eyes

Jun 27, 2010

It’s An Economic War Stupid

A war analogy is used to describe the situation in the Gulf. From the Oval Office, Obama addressed, “the battle we’re waging,” saying, that our shores and citizens are being assaulted.

We are in a war. But to watch the political maneuvering taking place in Washington, it appears we are at a war with BP, when we should be partnering with them to battle the constant flow gushing into the Gulf.

Earlier this month, Obama demonized BP for spending money on television ads. BP is in the midst of a PR nightmare—exacerbated by ill-managed comments from the CEO. BP needs to consider their stockholders, pensioners, and their future ability to pay.

In effort to lift their own lackluster performance, the administration has to paint BP as the villains. There is plenty of blame to go around and surely BP will end up owning a fair share of it, but no one wins if BP is not healthy. In the last month, their stock has sunk, the news is rife with reports of a possible bankruptcy, and talk is heard of a potential government seizure. In order to pay the myriad charges against them, BP needs to be solvent—even successful. The President shooting at them shows how little he understands about basic business principles—unless his goal is the demise of BP.

A few days later, Obama ratcheted up the adversarial tone when he declared that BP’s CEO Tony Hayward, “wouldn’t be working for me after any of those statements.”

Then, he summoned the BP executives to the White House as newscasters commented on the “perp walk.” Whatever happened to “innocent until proven guilty?”

Once there, they went through what Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) called a “shake down” resulting in agreement to a $20 billion escrow fund—which they probably would have agreed to even under friendly circumstances. BP has repeatedly offered assurances of payment. This was not something they had to do. But the actions circumvented the law.  Why is there so little outrage over the denial of due process?

Like his colleagues, Tony Hayward was called in front of Congress—patiently listening to their attacks and accusations while he was “sliced and diced.” Henry Waxman (D-CA) all but acknowledged that after reviewing thousands of pages of internal documents, there was little evidence of upper-level executives being aware of the problems with the well. (Most of us have worked for a company where we were confident that the CEO has little awareness of what was really going on.) The interrogation produced little but political grandstanding by representatives who want to look like they are doing something. The hearings are a distraction, an attempt to shape the agenda and push cap and trade as was made clear by Ed Markey’s (D-MA) opening comments.

One Representative defended their actions by saying that they were protecting the American Citizens—an apt role for government. But if government was truly on it on day one, no escrow fund, no hearings would be needed. Despite the quantity of past violations, the government approved BP’s drilling and disaster response plans. A luncheon was even scheduled honor BP with a safety award for that very well. There has been plenty of cronyism between BP, the MMS and the administration that points to a failure of government as much as it does to BP. With proper government protection, the blow out may never have happened.

The government’s actions toward BP set a terrible precedent of government vs. business. The drilling moratorium is an example: it is government who has caused massive laid-offs.

Additionally, the government/business relationship is fickle. BP may have received favors because they were about to endorse the President’s beloved cap and trade scheme. When you are a big business who can help the agenda, you get perks and exemptions—otherwise, the policies punish you. Who’d want to invest, or grow? Businesses fear government may turn on them.

We’re in economic peril. Out-of-touch elitists shouldn’t beleaguer job creators. They should work with them, be on the same team. No one wins when business goes bankrupt. Congress needs to quit grandstanding and work with the oil companies to find solutions to the Gulf crisis. There will be plenty of time later for investigations and interrogations.

Yes, we are in a war, but it is not a war against BP or even against the oil spill. It’s an economic war, and if we do not draft a different battle plan, America is going to lose.


Marita Noon is the executive director of the Citizens Alliance for Responsible Energy (CARE), a nonprofit, membership-based organization advocating for citizens rights to energy freedom. She can be reached at marita@responsiblenergy.org or www.responsiblenergy.org

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Uh, innocent until proven guilty!!! With live feed coming from the floor of the gulf it's obvious: BP created this mess. It seems Marita and many commentators have NOT listened to the testimony of surviving rig workers from this well. Management decisions overroad safety and environmental concerns. With business it's about the bottom line and little else. Sure, BP and others have had a good history of successful wells in the gulf thus maybe making them a little too comfortable with decisions to override safety and environmental concerns.

I'm puzzled why government is being made the bad guy. It was BP who created this mess. Had they been running this well in a responsible manner nothing bad would have occurred. BP is responsible and needs to pay the full costs for the cleanup. We would expect the same if Intel dumped a million gallons of toxic waste in the bosque.

Some will say that BP was FORCED to drill in deep waters because of the government. Funny, drilling has been going on in the gulf since 1947, long before the word environmentalism entered our vocabulary. BP competes with others for drilling thus must go where the oil is - in deep water. Big oil finds can only be found in deep and/or tough remote areas. The easy finds where taken years ago.

You see politicians lined up because Americans want their government to do something. And I say yeah, government, make BP pay the full cost of cleanup and to make everyone they damaged whole. That's the way it works for the "little" guy.

One thing I do agree with - its dumb and irresponsible to ban drilling. And a judge agreed so Obama has been sidelined on this issue.

Anonymous said...

there is a big greasy barboa spill over in homicide. yuck. put a cap on that spew.

Anonymous said...

This site will end up like the "what's wrong with this picture" site -- lots of posts and no comments because no one really gives a crap about it. I have noticed that the Eye comments have gone WAY down recently. BTW: I think the journalist that is the Eye is not the same person. If this post even makes it up....a lot of mine don't but then again I've cut down on reading to about once a month.

Anonymous said...

I totally agree with the 3rd comment, especially the description of Marita Noon.