Much ado has been made about a supposed change in the APD's discipline policy when it comes to issues of untruthfulness. Which is another term for deception. Or also known as omission. And known as misrepresentation. But let's call it for what it is: LYING.
And Banks knows a lot about lying. Under oath in an administrative hearing, he was caught lying by attorney, and now state Democratic Party Chariman, Sam Bregman. During the testimony you will also hear former Deputy Chief Feist's lies...Listen to their lies for yourself here on YouTube: [CLICK HERE]
But now, Banks, who we guess is interim chief now because there's no comment from Schultz, says that one has to look at the totality of the circumstances. Huh? All investigations are done from the perspective of a totality of the circumstances. That is why from Day 1 in the APD Academy cadets are told to ALWAYS tell the truth because lying will get you fired. Under the new policy, if an officer LIES then it seems their lie will be looked at in the totality of the investigation. If you lie during an investigation, that action itself is looked at as an aggravating or mitigating factor. That is why personal MUST tell the truth, the act of covering up misconduct is often much worse than the misconduct itself. Former and departed President Richard Nixon is the ultimate example.
Circumstances which should not only get people fired, but indicted. Like when former APD officer Levi Chavez ran his car into a kid riding his bike as a P2/C and lied about the accident. Like when an officer rear-ends a citizen in his marked unit and gives her a false report number. Like when an off-duty sergeant lies and says he was chasing a drunk driver. Like when APOA President Weber says he was "vaguely aware" of the policy. Like when Commander Tim Lopez stated two other APD officers were insubordinate and started a fight with him. Like when Deputy Chief Banks lies and says he was not in the crime scene of prominent civil right's attorney's house. Like when Ray Schultz says response times for calls for service are not important (we could go on and on about Schultz but you get our point). Like when CAO Perry says his administration is a leader in transparency and then tells citizens to sue him to get informatin about city expenditures. Like when RJ Berry says crime is at an all-time low thanks to his policies. And it goes on and on and on....
Circumstances which should not only get people fired, but indicted. Like when former APD officer Levi Chavez ran his car into a kid riding his bike as a P2/C and lied about the accident. Like when an officer rear-ends a citizen in his marked unit and gives her a false report number. Like when an off-duty sergeant lies and says he was chasing a drunk driver. Like when APOA President Weber says he was "vaguely aware" of the policy. Like when Commander Tim Lopez stated two other APD officers were insubordinate and started a fight with him. Like when Deputy Chief Banks lies and says he was not in the crime scene of prominent civil right's attorney's house. Like when Ray Schultz says response times for calls for service are not important (we could go on and on about Schultz but you get our point). Like when CAO Perry says his administration is a leader in transparency and then tells citizens to sue him to get informatin about city expenditures. Like when RJ Berry says crime is at an all-time low thanks to his policies. And it goes on and on and on....
If the leaders of this place lead by lying, what do they expect their troops to do?!?!
A government institution, nevermind a police department, has to have ZERO TOLERANCE for lying. Retired Lieutenant Steve Tate commented that truthfulness has only one level: truth or not. We agree. And while Banks seems to think that APD operates under it's own best practices, we are not persuaded by any argument offered by a confirmed liar about SOP policies addressing lying. We can hear it now in the echoes of the court room, "Officer X, isn't it true, that you're department allows officers to lie?"
Of interest, Berry is silent on this topic. One can only believe Berry's beliefs follow that of his chief and he too condones lying.