In this past Sunday's Albuquerque Journal, the paper reported the results of a mayoral poll as conducted by Research & Polling, Inc.
The results of the the paper's poll were splashed all over the Sunday paper and they showed that their poll found of the 402 "likely voters" contacted by phone: 63% were for Berry, 18% for Dinelli, 2% for Heh, and 17% refusing to answer.
The paper promoted this poll as a scientific sampling of voters. But the paper obviously omits some serious facts. It does not reveal that the script used in the calls positions Berry as not just another candidate but the person to beat. And after seating Berry in a sitting-must-be-removed position, the poll then asks voters:
"If the election for mayor were held today, and the candidates were Richard J. Berry, Pete Dinelli, and Paul J. Heh, who would you vote for?”
The results of the the paper's poll were splashed all over the Sunday paper and they showed that their poll found of the 402 "likely voters" contacted by phone: 63% were for Berry, 18% for Dinelli, 2% for Heh, and 17% refusing to answer.
The paper promoted this poll as a scientific sampling of voters. But the paper obviously omits some serious facts. It does not reveal that the script used in the calls positions Berry as not just another candidate but the person to beat. And after seating Berry in a sitting-must-be-removed position, the poll then asks voters:
"If the election for mayor were held today, and the candidates were Richard J. Berry, Pete Dinelli, and Paul J. Heh, who would you vote for?”
With the seed already planted in the the respondent's mind, the poll then moves in with a questions to reinforce what it has already planted.
So we at the Eye are actually surprised that the paper's poll didn't show Berry at over 80% After all, if not for Berry, much of what we call as our paper would be gone.
You see, over the last few years, under the failed leadership of RJ Berry, the Albuquerque Journal, has reaped hundred's of thousands of dollars in ad revenue. Our Eyes tell us:
2010: $586,501.82
2011: $419,985.07
2012: $662,792.29
So we at the Eye are actually surprised that the paper's poll didn't show Berry at over 80% After all, if not for Berry, much of what we call as our paper would be gone.
You see, over the last few years, under the failed leadership of RJ Berry, the Albuquerque Journal, has reaped hundred's of thousands of dollars in ad revenue. Our Eyes tell us:
2010: $586,501.82
2011: $419,985.07
2012: $662,792.29
That's over $1.5 Million in ad revenue for a paper that, let's be honest, has died and is merely positioning itself to be bought. $1.5 Million in ad revenue makes the City of Albuquerque one of the largest accounts held by Lang and Walz's dying paper. Would they do anything to upset what they already have? Obviously not.
So folks, the million dollar question is, would the Albuquerque Journal actually contract a poll taker to do an honest and objective poll knowing that the results are not in their interest?
Of course not.
That is why Berry's camp has been on the ultra offensive against Mr. Dinelli. If he were truly at 63%, the last thing he would do, is just what he's done for the last 3 1/2 years: Anything.
Our Eyes from within Berry's camp (yes you read that correctly) tell us that not only does a true poll show that Berry is below the required 50%, but that he is terrified of the upcoming debates.
Of course not.
That is why Berry's camp has been on the ultra offensive against Mr. Dinelli. If he were truly at 63%, the last thing he would do, is just what he's done for the last 3 1/2 years: Anything.
Our Eyes from within Berry's camp (yes you read that correctly) tell us that not only does a true poll show that Berry is below the required 50%, but that he is terrified of the upcoming debates.

















